Pareto Front
Batch 16 had the shortest formation time among the Pareto solutions while retaining 91 cycles of EOL. Batch 15 had the highest average end-of-life performance among batches 0 through 16. Under the primary analysis excluding batch 17, batch…
1 sources - 5 claims
Batch 16 had the shortest formation time among the Pareto solutions while retaining 91 cycles of EOL. Batch 15 had the highest average end-of-life performance among batches 0 through 16. Under the primary analysis excluding batch 17, batches 0, 15, and 16 formed the Pareto front. Including batch 17 expanded the Pareto front and shifted the apparent optimum toward approximately 0.8 C. The work demonstrated a Pareto-approximation workflow rather than a fully validated production formation protocol.